GPM IMERG和ERA5降水數(shù)據(jù)精度在云南復(fù)雜地形區(qū)域的評估檢驗
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項目:

國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(41165004)、云南省臨滄市氣象局“短平快”科研項目資助


Accuracy Evaluation and Comparison of GPM IMERG and ERA5 Precipitation Products over Complex Terrain of Yunnan
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計
  • |
  • 參考文獻
  • |
  • 相似文獻
  • |
  • 引證文獻
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    為評估和對比GPM IMERG、ERA5降水數(shù)據(jù)在云南的適用性,利用2014年4月至2018年6月的地面氣象觀測數(shù)據(jù)、GPM IMERG衛(wèi)星遙感降水產(chǎn)品和ERA5再分析降水數(shù)據(jù),采用定量和分類評分7項指標評估GPM IMERG和ERA5日降水產(chǎn)品在云南的適用性。結(jié)果表明:2種數(shù)據(jù)存在小雨日雨量高估,中雨及以上量級雨日雨量低估的問題,ERA5數(shù)據(jù)更為突出,小雨日居多導(dǎo)致降水整體高估;GPM IMERG數(shù)據(jù)空、漏報并存,ERA5則高空報、低漏報嚴重;小雨日較多(較少)的區(qū)域2種數(shù)據(jù)易出現(xiàn)高漏報(空報);不同雨強區(qū)間GPM IMERG秋季降水數(shù)據(jù)精度最高,冬季存在低雨強低估,高雨強高估的不同表現(xiàn);20 mm/d以下中低雨強段上2種降水數(shù)據(jù)與地面站點數(shù)據(jù)誤差較小,雨強變大,誤差增大,雨強大于20 mm/d時,2種數(shù)據(jù)隨雨強增大與站點偏差差異更為顯著;隨坡度和起伏度增大2種降水數(shù)據(jù)精度呈變差趨勢;多項指標評估表明GPM IMERG降水數(shù)據(jù)在云南具有更高精度。研究結(jié)果為應(yīng)用和開展農(nóng)業(yè)、水利、水文、氣象等相關(guān)學(xué)科研究提供參考依據(jù)。

    Abstract:

    The uncertainty of the satellite precipitation products limits their applicability in complex terrain areas. This paper evaluates the applicability of the new rainfall products, GPM (Global Precipitation Measurement) IMERG (Integrated MultisatellitE Retrievals for GPM) and ERA5 precipitation in Yunnan Province area based on the meteorological data. The data of a total of 125 weather stations from April 2014 to June 2018 are used to evaluate and compare the accuracies of GPM IMERG and ERA5. The correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), relative bias (BIAS), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and the classification statistical analysis indexes (POD, FAR, CIS) are used to assess the applicability of GPM IMERG and ERA5. The result shows that: The two kinds of data have the problems of overestimation of daily precipitation of light rainfall and underestimation of daily precipitation of moderate and above rainfall, and ERA5 data is more prominent in this respect. GPM IMERG data have both higher false and missing alarm rates, while ERA5 data have seriously higher and lower missing rate, especially in light rain days. The areas with more (less) light rain days are in good agreement with the two areas with higher missing (false) rates. In autumn, the precipitation data accuracy of GPM IMERG is the highest in different rain intensity ranges. In winter, there are different performances: underestimation of low rain intensity and overestimation of high rain intensity. For the medium and low rainfall intensity of below 20 mm/d, the errors between the two precipitation data and ground station data are relatively small, and the errors increase with the increasing rain intensity. When the rain intensity is greater than 20 mm/d, the difference between the two data and the station increases more significantly with the increasing rain intensity. With the increase of slope and fluctuation, the accuracy of two kinds of precipitation data presents a trend of deterioration. The evaluation indexes show that GPM IMERG precipitation data have higher accuracy in Yunnan. The research results provide a reference for the application and development of agriculture, water conservancy, hydrology, meteorology and other related disciplines.

    參考文獻
    相似文獻
    引證文獻
引用本文

趙平偉,李斌,王佳妮,楊宏慶,郭萍,龔麗軍. GPM IMERG和ERA5降水數(shù)據(jù)精度在云南復(fù)雜地形區(qū)域的評估檢驗[J].氣象科技,2021,49(1):114~123

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標
  • 點擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-02
  • 定稿日期:2020-09-07
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2021-03-04
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術(shù)支持:北京勤云科技發(fā)展有限公司
新兴县| 彰化县| 东辽县| 西昌市| 南皮县| 开阳县| 绥中县| 彭山县| 岳普湖县| 河曲县| 海口市| 丹凤县| 江口县| 民勤县| 隆化县| 尤溪县| 阿拉善盟| 五莲县| 商水县| 东港市| 顺昌县| 虹口区| 启东市| 大渡口区| 车险| 左云县| 周宁县| 中阳县| 曲麻莱县| 洪湖市| 本溪市| 遵义县| 葵青区| 龙口市| 仲巴县| 顺义区| 仪征市| 渝中区| 石泉县| 佛教| 故城县|