ASC200型地基雙波段全天空云量自動(dòng)觀測(cè)儀云量比對(duì)分析
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

中國(guó)氣象局氣象探測(cè)中心青年基金項(xiàng)目“基于毫米波云雷達(dá)云狀識(shí)別關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究”(TCQN201805)及安徽省科技重大專項(xiàng)“基于北斗技術(shù)的區(qū)域精準(zhǔn)氣象監(jiān)測(cè)系統(tǒng)研發(fā)與應(yīng)用示范”(812126841050)共同資助


Cloud Cover Comparative Analysis Based on Ground-based Dual-band All-sky Imager ASC200
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問(wèn)統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    采用ASC200型地基雙波段全天空云量自動(dòng)觀測(cè)儀2019年2—5月在中國(guó)氣象局長(zhǎng)沙國(guó)家綜合氣象觀測(cè)試驗(yàn)基地和上海寶山國(guó)家基本氣象站的連續(xù)觀測(cè)數(shù)據(jù),分別與人工觀測(cè)云量及器測(cè)云量參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行比對(duì),從綜合云量、可見(jiàn)光云量及紅外云量3方面初步探究其云量觀測(cè)能力。比對(duì)結(jié)果顯示:該設(shè)備長(zhǎng)沙站和寶山站綜合云量樣本與人工云量參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差值在±20%以內(nèi)的樣本分別占總量的92.2%和79.4%,長(zhǎng)沙站綜合云量樣本與器測(cè)云量參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差值在±20%以內(nèi)的占樣本總量的90.5%,差值在±10%以內(nèi)的占樣本總量的86%。結(jié)論如下:①ASC200綜合云量樣本與人工及器測(cè)云量參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)一致性良好;②驗(yàn)證了可見(jiàn)光云量觀測(cè)系統(tǒng)在霧霾等天氣條件下觀測(cè)能力較弱,紅外云量觀測(cè)系統(tǒng)對(duì)卷云的觀測(cè)能力較弱;③在能見(jiàn)度良好的觀測(cè)條件下,雙波段云量觀測(cè)系統(tǒng)的云量觀測(cè)能力優(yōu)于單一波段云量觀測(cè)系統(tǒng)。

    Abstract:

    Based on the continuous observation data of the ground-based dual-band all-sky imager (ASC200) from February to May 2019 at the National Integrated Meteorological Observation (Science) Testbed of the China Meteorological Administration in Changsha and the National Basic Weather Station in Baoshan, compared with manual and instrument measurement reference standards, the analysis aims to evaluate the detectability of ASC200 from the three aspects of visible cloud cover, infrared cloud cover and comprehensive cloud cover. The comparison results show that: Samples of comprehensive cloud cover with a difference within ±20% from manual reference standards account for 92.2% at Changsha and 79.4% at Baoshan of the total samples, respectively. Samples of comprehensive cloud cover at Changsha with a difference within ±20% from instrument measurement reference standard cloud cover account for 90.5%, and those with a difference within ±10% account for 86%. The results indicate: (1) Samples of ASC200 comprehensive cloud cover are in good consistency with manual and instrument measurement reference standards; (2) It is verified that the visible cloud observation system is weak in observation under haze or fog weather, and the infrared cloud observation system is weak in cirrus observation; (3) Under the conventional observation conditions with better visibility, the dualband cloud cover observation system is superior to the single band cloud cover observation system.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

溫強(qiáng),陶法,劉達(dá)新,胡樹(shù)貞,王依人. ASC200型地基雙波段全天空云量自動(dòng)觀測(cè)儀云量比對(duì)分析[J].氣象科技,2022,50(2):161~170

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-05
  • 定稿日期:2021-12-08
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2022-04-28
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問(wèn)者
技術(shù)支持:北京勤云科技發(fā)展有限公司
都匀市| 东乡族自治县| 资中县| 平湖市| 弥勒县| 台中市| 沙洋县| 安宁市| 景东| 甘南县| 临澧县| 河源市| 禄丰县| 前郭尔| 平远县| 大余县| 信丰县| 咸阳市| 沅陵县| 太仆寺旗| 望奎县| 万安县| 武隆县| 滕州市| 通州区| 田林县| 紫阳县| 靖安县| 梅州市| 西盟| 河间市| 鲁山县| 清徐县| 故城县| 哈尔滨市| 尤溪县| 五华县| 衡山县| 波密县| 新昌县| 永安市|