AE, RMAE, and BIAS are 1.5 mm, 1.0, and 0.03 mm respectively, and the CORR is higher than 0.9. Comparing the quantitative precipitation estimation at different levels of precipitation before and after calibration produced by the best parameters shows that the MAE and RMAE of light rain are reduced by 90%, and the CORR is about 0.87. The MAE and RMAE in moderate to heavy rain are decreased by 89%, and the CORR is higher than 0.9. The MAE and RMAE of rainstorm are decreased by more than 83.9%, and the CORR is about 0.77. Based on the verification of a widespread rainfall case on 26 August 2020, the intensity and spatial distribution of the quantitative precipitation estimation after calibration are closer to the gauge observations. The original quantitative precipitation estimation is relatively smooth and lacks small-scale variations. The calibrated results can reflect the characteristics of the local change that is consistent with the observation of gauges. The results of this paper suggest that the optimal interpolation method with optimised local parameters can significantly improve the accuracy of the quantitative precipitation estimation, which has important application value for rainstorm warning and flood disaster prevention."/>
Archive > Volume 52 Issue 5 > 2024,52(5):619-629. DOI:10.19517/j.1671-6345.20230291 Prev Next

Research on Optimization of Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Calibration Method

You are thevisitors
Supported by:Beijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co., Ltd.
枣阳市| 三穗县| 汝阳县| 神木县| 灵川县| 遵化市| 宁德市| 成武县| 麻栗坡县| 南投市| 西峡县| 玛纳斯县| 延川县| 定结县| 南岸区| 浦城县| 常州市| 黑河市| 开鲁县| 石阡县| 贵溪市| 长子县| 稻城县| 余干县| 石河子市| 上饶市| 康马县| 娄烦县| 仁寿县| 海门市| 白山市| 临澧县| 奎屯市| 肃宁县| 靖远县| 营口市| 临江市| 盐山县| 临沧市| 台东县| 德江县|