霧霾天氣個(gè)例氣象條件對(duì)比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(41505013)、山東省自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(BS2015HZ019)、山東省氣象局重點(diǎn)課題(2014sdqxz01)、華東區(qū)域協(xié)同創(chuàng)新基金合作項(xiàng)目(QYHZ201401)、中國氣象局預(yù)報(bào)員專項(xiàng)(CMAYBY2016039)資助


Comparative Analysis of Meteorological Conditions for Fog and Haze Cases
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    應(yīng)用常規(guī)觀測(cè)資料、NCEP 1°×1°再分析資料和L波段探空資料從環(huán)流形勢(shì)、擴(kuò)散條件和邊界層特征3個(gè)方面對(duì)2013年兩次霧、霾天氣個(gè)例進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,結(jié)果表明:500 hPa西北氣流冷平流、地面弱風(fēng)場(chǎng)、垂直速度呈弱上升〖CD*2〗下沉的垂直分層特點(diǎn)和逆溫是兩次霧、霾天氣出現(xiàn)和維持的共同特征。地面西北風(fēng)、850 hPa弱冷平流、近地層淺薄的接地逆溫(100~200 m)和濕層與霾天氣對(duì)應(yīng),地面偏東風(fēng)、850 hPa暖平流、925 hPa以下深厚的懸浮逆溫(400 m)和濕層與霧天氣對(duì)應(yīng),霾過程較霧過程逆溫強(qiáng)度強(qiáng),上升運(yùn)動(dòng)高度高。消散時(shí)霧較霾下沉運(yùn)動(dòng)中心高度低,強(qiáng)度弱;霾消散時(shí)接地逆溫特征變化不大,霧消散時(shí)懸浮逆溫有底部抬升和大氣穩(wěn)定層結(jié)向中性層結(jié)轉(zhuǎn)變的變化特征;但均有下沉氣流接地、垂直風(fēng)切變較強(qiáng)和高層低露點(diǎn)干空氣下傳到地面的特點(diǎn)。

    Abstract:

    Based on conventional observational data, NECP 1°×1° reanalysis data, and Lband sounding second data, two fog and haze cases occurred in 2013 are analyzed,including the circulation situation, diffusion conditions, and boundary layer characteristics. The results are as follows: the northwest flow and cold advection at 500 hPa, weak wind on the ground, updraftdowndraft distribution for vertical velocity, and inversion were the common features when fog or haze occurred. Northwest wind, cold advection at 850 hPa, shallow ground inversion (100 to 200 m), and thin wet layer corresponded with the haze. In contrast, east wind, warm advection at 850 hPa, deep suspended inversion (400 m) beneath 925 hPa, and thick wet layer corresponded with fog. The height of updraft was higher and the average intensity of inversion was stronger when the haze happened. The height of downdraft for the fog gone was lower and the intensity was weaker simultaneously. When the haze dissipated, the ground inversion almost had no change but for the fog, there were changes: bottomlifted suspension inversion and stable atmospheric stratification shifting to neutral. When the fog and haze disappeared, there were the following common features: downdrafts at upper levels reached at the ground; vertical wind shear increased and the dry air at upper levels with low dew point was transported to the ground.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

韓永清,孫興池,李靜,康桂紅,劉暢.霧霾天氣個(gè)例氣象條件對(duì)比分析[J].氣象科技,2017,45(1):172~178

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-28
  • 定稿日期:2016-08-05
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2017-02-28
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術(shù)支持:北京勤云科技發(fā)展有限公司
大冶市| 常州市| 句容市| 星座| 千阳县| 巨鹿县| 宣化县| 青铜峡市| 肇东市| 井冈山市| 清苑县| 海门市| 法库县| 沂源县| 依安县| 扶风县| 平阳县| 武清区| 油尖旺区| 万山特区| 仁寿县| 盘锦市| 太白县| 阿荣旗| 晋州市| 洪雅县| 应用必备| 伊宁县| 永和县| 玉环县| 道孚县| 崇仁县| 玉田县| 腾冲县| 抚松县| 顺昌县| 花垣县| 德钦县| 民勤县| 漳州市| 崇义县|