CMIP5全球氣候模式對(duì)1981—2005年東北地表溫度的模擬分析
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡(jiǎn)介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號(hào):

基金項(xiàng)目:

國(guó)家重點(diǎn)研發(fā)計(jì)劃(2018YFC0809400)、北京科技新星計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(XX2016067)和國(guó)家電網(wǎng)公司總部科技項(xiàng)目“基于廣域時(shí)空大數(shù)據(jù)分析的風(fēng)電功率預(yù)測(cè)方法研究與應(yīng)用”資助


Land Surface Temperature Simulations of CMIP5 Models over Northeast China during 1981-2005
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評(píng)論
    摘要:

    利用中國(guó)東北1981—2005年173個(gè)氣象臺(tái)站觀測(cè)的月平均地表(0 cm)溫度資料和參加IPCC第五次評(píng)估報(bào)告的43個(gè)全球氣候模式模擬結(jié)果,對(duì)比分析了CMIP5耦合氣候模式對(duì)中國(guó)東北地區(qū)地表溫度的模擬性能。結(jié)果表明:大部分氣候模式模擬結(jié)果都能較好的再現(xiàn)研究區(qū)域的地表溫度時(shí)空變化,與月觀測(cè)的時(shí)間相關(guān)系數(shù)均高于095,對(duì)年際變化模擬能力稍差,大部分模式模擬結(jié)果在整個(gè)研究時(shí)段均表現(xiàn)出冷偏差。空間分布顯示,CMIP5模式能夠模擬出中國(guó)東北地區(qū)地表溫度南高北低的空間分布特征,但不同模式模擬結(jié)果之間差異較大,模擬能力較優(yōu)模式能夠較好的模擬出研究區(qū)域的冷暖中心,較優(yōu)模式組和較差模式組在夏季的差距達(dá)到最大,較差模式組不能再現(xiàn)地表溫度的分布特征。通過模式優(yōu)選發(fā)現(xiàn)FGOALS_s2模式表現(xiàn)最優(yōu)。總的來說,CMIP5耦合氣候模式對(duì)中國(guó)東北區(qū)域地表溫度的時(shí)空變化特征的模擬性能較好,對(duì)氣候態(tài)年變化的模擬性能好于對(duì)年際變化的模擬。

    Abstract:

    The performances of 43 CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phrase 5) models which participate in the Fifth IPCC Assessment (IPCC AR5) in simulating the land surface temperature (0 cm) over Northeast China during 1981-2005 are compared and analyzed using the outputs of CMIP5 models and the observation data from 173 meteorological stations. Results show that:most the climate model simulation results can reproduce the temporal and spatial changes of land surface temperature in the study area; the time correlation coefficient of the monthly observation is higher than 095; the cold deviation is found mostly throughout the studied period, and the simulation capability of interannual variation is limited. The spatial distribution shows that the CMIP5 models can simulate the spatial temperature distribution characteristics of high in the south and low temperature in the north over Northeast China, but the differences between the simulation results of different models are large and the models can simulate the warm and cold centers. The difference between the good and poor model groups in summer is the largest, and the poor model group cannot reproduce the distribution characteristics of the surface temperature. It is found that the FGOALS_s2 model is optimal. In general, the CMIP5 coupled climate models have good performances for the temporal and spatial variation of surface temperature in Northeast China, and the simulation performance of monthly value is better than that of interannual variation.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

馮雙磊,靳雙龍,劉曉琳,馬振強(qiáng),胡菊,宋宗朋. CMIP5全球氣候模式對(duì)1981—2005年東北地表溫度的模擬分析[J].氣象科技,2018,46(6):1154~1164

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-08
  • 定稿日期:2018-09-11
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2018-12-27
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術(shù)支持:北京勤云科技發(fā)展有限公司
汨罗市| 禹州市| 邵阳县| 瑞安市| 建阳市| 武城县| 无为县| 龙岩市| 鄂托克前旗| 沙坪坝区| 武清区| 遵义县| 仲巴县| 田林县| 江油市| 海林市| 乌审旗| 澜沧| 双鸭山市| 天柱县| 霍林郭勒市| 股票| 高州市| 平乡县| 泌阳县| 会泽县| 昭苏县| 宜阳县| 南川市| 堆龙德庆县| 新丰县| 宜君县| 格尔木市| 彭阳县| 邢台县| 保定市| 油尖旺区| 东源县| 洛浦县| 郴州市| 灯塔市|