2017年春夏呼倫貝爾草原干旱過程多種監(jiān)測指數(shù)對比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者單位:

作者簡介:

通訊作者:

中圖分類號:

基金項(xiàng)目:

干旱氣象科學(xué)研究基金(IAM201706),內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)氣象局青年基金項(xiàng)目(nmqnqx201704),中國氣象局氣候變化專項(xiàng)項(xiàng)目(CCSF201721),內(nèi)蒙古自治區(qū)遙感創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)資助


Comparative Analysis of Monitoring Effect of Various Meteorological Drought Indexes and Vegetation Status Index during a Prairie Drought
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 圖/表
  • |
  • 訪問統(tǒng)計(jì)
  • |
  • 參考文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 引證文獻(xiàn)
  • |
  • 資源附件
  • |
  • 文章評論
    摘要:

    以2017年春夏季呼倫貝爾草原干旱過程為研究對象,利用呼倫貝爾草原范圍內(nèi)6個氣象站的氣溫、降水?dāng)?shù)據(jù)和MODIS NDVI數(shù)據(jù),分析對比2017年4—9月多種氣象干旱指數(shù)(Pa30、SPI30、SPEI30、CI、MCI)與植被狀態(tài)指數(shù)(VCI)的監(jiān)測情況。結(jié)果表明:只考慮單一降水的氣象干旱指數(shù)(Pa30、SPI30)在4月波動較大,且此類指數(shù)無法反映出高溫等其他氣象條件對干旱發(fā)展的影響。綜合氣象干旱指數(shù)(CI、MCI)由于引入多時間尺度干旱進(jìn)行計(jì)算,旱情緩解時輕旱等級持續(xù)的時間過長,且草原植被在降水增加后的恢復(fù)速度較快,造成干旱緩解期間植被與監(jiān)測結(jié)果差異較大。MCI與同期和前1期VCI的相關(guān)性最好,CI和SPEI30與前1期和前2期VCI的相關(guān)性較好,而只考慮單一降水的氣象干旱指數(shù)與VCI的相關(guān)性普遍偏差。植被對SPEI30的響應(yīng)時間更長,更適宜草原生態(tài)干旱的早期預(yù)警使用。

    Abstract:

    Based on a drought process in the Hulunbuir prairie from spring to summer in 2017, the monitoring results of various meteorological drought indexes (Pa30, SPI30, SPEI30, CI, MCI) and the Vegetation Status Index from April to September in 2017 are analyzed and compared by using the data of air temperature, precipitation and MODIS NDV of 6 meteorological stations. The results show that meteorological drought indexes (Pa30 and SPI30), which consider only precipitation, fluctuated greatly in April, which cannot reflect the impact of high temperature and other meteorological conditions on drought development. Due to the introduction of meteorological elements in CI and MCI calculation for multiperiods of time and the prolonged light drought while droughts alleviating, and the relatively rapid recovery of vegetation after the increase of precipitation, a large difference between vegetation and monitoring during drought remission are resulted in. The correlation between MCI and VCI in the same and previous periods is the best, and that between SPEI30 and VCI in the first two periods is good, and the correlation between Meteorological Drought Index and VCI, which considers only precipitation, is generally worse. With a longer response time for vegetation, SPEI30 is more suitable for the early warning of prairie ecological droughts.

    參考文獻(xiàn)
    相似文獻(xiàn)
    引證文獻(xiàn)
引用本文

曲學(xué)斌,金林雪,王穎,姜鳳友.2017年春夏呼倫貝爾草原干旱過程多種監(jiān)測指數(shù)對比分析[J].氣象科技,2019,47(1):163~170

復(fù)制
分享
文章指標(biāo)
  • 點(diǎn)擊次數(shù):
  • 下載次數(shù):
  • HTML閱讀次數(shù):
  • 引用次數(shù):
歷史
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-29
  • 定稿日期:2018-10-30
  • 錄用日期:
  • 在線發(fā)布日期: 2019-02-27
  • 出版日期:
您是第位訪問者
技術(shù)支持:北京勤云科技發(fā)展有限公司
年辖:市辖区| 特克斯县| 甘德县| 吉安市| 丰城市| 贵溪市| 灌阳县| 常宁市| 孟津县| 伊金霍洛旗| 苍南县| 仁寿县| 绥江县| 辰溪县| 武平县| 漠河县| 泸定县| 崇阳县| 顺义区| 澄城县| 武平县| 剑川县| 德化县| 雷山县| 方山县| 那坡县| 万荣县| 虞城县| 门源| 漳平市| 施甸县| 漳平市| 靖州| 湛江市| 沂水县| 当阳市| 普安县| 都匀市| 淄博市| 枣庄市| 高碑店市|